| |
|
| SEM
Component Details |
Introduction
The nature of the signals collected by an SEM in
order to form images are all dependent on the detector
used to collect them. Thus, an understanding of what
a detector is and how it produces the signal
being used is a necessary step towards understanding
just what in the world one is looking at in the SEM.
This section covers most of the common detector types
found in SEMs, as well as some of the less-common types.
|
The Everhart-Thornley detector |
| Invention of the Everhart-Thornley detector (E-T
for short) allowed the formation of images using the
secondary electron signal, which is much more dependent
on the sample topography at the point of intersection
of the primary beam with the sample. The end result
is higher potential resolution using this signal. Although
many people tend to gloss over the distinction, the
E-T detector is actually a combined signal detector,
rather than a pure secondary electron detector.
A typical E-T detector consists of a Faraday cage in
front of a scintillator, in turn coupled to a light
pipe leading to a photomultiplier tube (figure [E-T]).
The Faraday cage is typically kept at a positive potential
on the order of a few hundred volts so as to efficiently
collect most of the secondary electrons emitted from
the sample. The scintillator typically has a thin coating
of some conductor sufficient to maintain a positive
voltage of several kilovolts, so that the electrons
that pass the Faraday cage are accelerated into the
scintillator. When the electrons strike the scintillator
they produce light, which is in turn directed to the
photomultiplier by the light pipe. The photomultiplier
produces an output signal that is then related to the
total number of electrons collected.
Because the scintillator is typically in direct line-of-sight
with the sample, backscattered electrons (which usually
are too energetic to be deflected much by a 200V potential)
will also produce a signal in the detector, even if
a negative potential is applied to the Faraday cage.
In this case it is a pure backscattered electron detector.
By adjusting the cage potential, it is possible to 'tweak'
the topographic contrast given by the detector.
Most SEMs will have an E-T style detector, although
not all will allow adjustment of the collection potential.
Some E-T detectors are designed to be mobile, so that
the geometrical collection efficiency can be adjusted,
in addition to the collection potential. |
|
 |
| Detector placements inside an SEM chamber. E-T detector
is the wire meshwork and assembly to the right of center,
while a polepiece mounted BSE detector is just above center.
The black cone surrounds the polepiece. |
Backscattered Electron (BSE) Detectors
| In addition to the E-T detector mentioned above,
dedicated backscattered electron detectors are reasonably
common. |
| Scintillator |
| The simplest BSE detector is simply a stripped-down
version of the E-T detector. These consist of a coated
scintillator coupled to a photomultiplier by a light
pipe. Because there is no collection potential, the
collection efficiency of these detectors is directly
related to the scintillator size and proximity to the
sample. Additionally, the strength of the signal is
dependent on the backscattered electron energy, so a
low-energy BSE will contribute less to the total signal
than will a high-energy BSE. |
| Silicon diode |
| A diode-type BSE detector is based off the fact
that an energetic electron hitting a semiconductor will
tend to loose its energy by producing electron-hole
pairs. Again, the number of electron-hole pairs will
be dependent on the initial electron energy, so higher
energy electrons will tend to contribute more to the
signal. The simplest diode detector is a p-n junction
with electrodes on the front and back of the sample.
The holes will tend to migrate to one electrode, while
the electrons will migrate to the other, thus producing
a current, the total of which is dependent on the electron
flux and the electron energy. Response time of the detector
can be improved by putting a potential across the diode,
at the expense of increased noise in the signal.
Diode detectors are frequently mounted on the microscope
polepiece (as the greatest BSE yield is typically straight
up for a horizontal surface), and it is common to break
them into a number of sections which may be individually
added to or subtracted from the signal. A four quadrant
Si diode detector of this type can be seen mounted to
the bottom of the polepiece in the above figure. |
| Channel plates |
| The basic idea behind a channel plate is secondary
electron emission. A channel plate (or microchannel
plate) is based off a plate consisting of a large number
of tubes stretching from one side to another. Each side
of the plate has an electrode, the sample side at ground
or slightly negative potential, and the opposite side
at a substantial positive potential. The insides of
the tubes are coated with some material with a high
secondary electron yield.
In operation, backscattered electrons strike the inside
of the tubes (or possibly the front electrode, which
also produces secondary electrons), which in turn causes
emission of multiple electrons by the high coating material
inside the tube. These secondary and backscattered electrons
are in turn accelerated down the tube by the potential
between the two face electrodes, and at some point impact
the tube wall, producing more scattered electrons and
repeating the process. This cascade effect causes each
initial signal electron to produce a measurable current
which can be used as a signal.
|
Other detector types
| Sample Current |
| A sample current detector is simply a
very sensitive ammeter with a fast response time that
measures the current passing from the sample stage to
ground. Because the total current is a function of the
backscattered, secondary, Auger, etc. electron yield
at any point on the sample, this signal is sensitive
to all the contrast mechanisms of the other electron
signals. Because of the dominance of the backscattered
and secondary electron signals to this signal, and because
the secondary yield is in turn dependent on the backscattered
yield, the sample current signal typically resembles
the inverted backscattered electron signal. |
|
| Cathodoluminescence |
| A cathodoluminescence detector is sensitive
to the optical photons emitted by some materials under
beam excitation. These typically consist of some arrangement
of mirrors/light guides and a photomultiplier tube. |
| X-Ray Detectors: |
X-ray detectors are useful for examining
the X-ray spectrum emitted by the sample under the influence
of the beam electrons. Because most elements emit easily
measurable characteristic X-rays, the X-ray spectrum
collected from each region of a sample can provide useful
information on the elemental composition of the region
of the sample under the electron beam. |
| |
Energy Dispersive X-Ray Detector (EDS) |
| |
The EDS detector (sometimes called EDX detector)
is essentially a large single crystal semiconductor
that has either been treated to approximate an ideal
semiconductor, or is of high enough purity to truly
be an intrinsic semiconductor. This intrinsic semiconductor
is cooled so there is very little thermionic creation
of charge carriers, typically by liquid nitrogen. Front
and back contacts are kept at several kilovolts potential
relative to each other. X-rays that pass through the
front contact will tend to dissipate their energy creating
electron-hole pairs in the intrinsic region; because
each electron-hole pair has a characteristic creation
energy, the total number of charge carriers created
is proportional to the energy of the incident X-ray.
Thus, by measuring the charge pulse that is created
for each X-ray, the energy of the X-ray can be determined.
A computer keeps track of the number of counts within
each energy range, and the total collected X-ray spectrum
can then be determined. |
| |
Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Detector (WDS) |
| |
A WDS detector uses X-ray diffraction to separate
the different X-ray energies (and therefore wavelengths)
emitted from the sample. WDS detectors tend to require
much more space than EDS detectors, as well as higher
probe currents and long collection times (due to lower
collection efficiencies). WDS resolution is far superior
to EDS resolution, making it the detector of choice
for samples with many closely spaced peaks, or careful
analytical work. |
|
|
|